Prostate Cancer Test and The Survival Rates of Those Who Had Surgery for Prostate Cancer

Efficacy of the PSA test Approximately one man inclinical trials for any type of cancer, it has been found
six will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during histhat there is no difference in the survival rates of
lifetime, and over 200,000 men in the US arethose prostate cancer patients who had surgery and
diagnosed with prostate cancer annually. Since thecontrols who did not. Those who had surgery
widespread adoption of PSA testing, about 60-70%suffered increased morbidity effects such as
of men at risk in the US have had a blood test forimpotence or incontinence. Interpreting statistics for
prostate cancer. As a result, prostate cancer deathprostate cancer intervention. A recent paper
rates have decreased, yet only slightly. Thirtyreporting on the result of a randomized trial
thousand men still die each year from this disease.comparing Radical Prostatectomy with Watchful
PSA testing fails to identify a small but significantWaiting for prostate cancer appeared to contain
proportion of aggressive cancers, and only aboutserious flaws. For example, it used an ambiguous
30% of men with a ¡°positive¡±definition of ¡°death from prostate
PSA have a positive biopsy. Additionally, of men whocancer¡± and claimed a 50% reduction in
were treated for prostate cancer, about 25% requiremortality using surgery as compared with watchful
additional treatment, presumably due to diseasewaiting. The reduction in overall mortality was not
recurrence. Also of concern is the growing evidencesignificant. Smart consumers know their rights and
that treatments may not be necessary. Veryact on them. Information is the best defense against
long-term studies from the US and Europe, followingpurchasing defective products or falling victim to
men with prostate cancer, have found that somefraudulent practices. Learn more about Advanced
tumors do not progress over time. In theseCancer Treatments please visit Similarly, a paper
individuals, prostate cancer treatment is unnecessary,reporting on results of a randomized trials comparing
if not harmful. As these men do not benefit frommortality after PSA screening with an unscreened
treatment, they are actually at risk ofcontrol group also contained serious flaws. Although
treatment-related side effects and complications.its authors claimed a 69% reduction of deaths due to
There is no difference in the survival rates of thosescreening, they arrived at this figure by comparing
who had surgery for prostate cancer and controlsonly 23% of those invited for screening in the Invited
who did not. This follows earlier reports that radicalgroup with 93.5% of those in the Uninvited group.
surgery for prostate cancer also tends to spread theThis was a meaningless comparison in randomized
disease. After 23 years, since the first randomizedtrials.