Prevention As "Watchful Waiting" and Other Breast Cancer Industry Absurdities

Breast Cancer Awareness Month,* sadly, hasdecisions about what we use as our medicine. Modern
become a time of increasing awareness not of thescience has increasingly confirmed the veracity of the
preventable causes of breast cancer, but of theHippocratean phrase: "let food be thy medicine," and
breast cancer industry's insatiable need to both raiseuntil a prescription is required to obtain and consume
money for research into a pharmaceutical cure, andorganic food, we have quite an amazing arsenal at
to promote its primary means of "prevention": earlyour disposal.
detection via x-ray mammography.1) Cruciferous Vegetables, such as broccoli, kale,
On first account, a pharmaceutical "cure" is as unlikelycollards, cabbage and cauliflower contain a variety of
as it is oxymoronic. Drugs do not cure diseasepowerful anti-cancer phytochemicals. The
anymore than bullets cure war. Beneath modernisothiocynanate sulfurane and the glucosinolate
medicine's showy display of diagnostic contraptions,indole-3 carbinol, in particular, have demonstrated
heroic "life-saving" procedures, and an armory ofsignificant in vitro and in vivo activity against breast
exotic drugs of strange origin and power, it is alwayscancer. Large population studies have demonstrated
the body's ability to heal itself - beneath the pompthat those who are in the top quarter percentile of
and circumstance - that is truly responsible forcruciferous vegetable consumption have 50% less
medicine's apparent successes. Too often, in spite ofchance of developing breast cancer than those in the
what medicine does to "treat" or "save" the body, itlowest quarter percentile. This sort of risk reduction
is the body which against invasive chemical andis impossible for a drug, and so, it is often played
surgical medical interventions, silently treats and savesdown, lest the oxymoronic farce of pharmaceutical
itself.prevention be revealed for what it is.
If it were not for the body's truly miraculous2) The Estrogen Connection. Most breast cancer is
self-healing abilities, and the ceaseless self-correctionestrogen receptor positive. For this reason reducing
process that occurs each and every moment withinthe effects of endogenously created estrogen, and
each and every cell in our bodies, it would die within areducing exposure to exogenously created estrogen
matter of hours. The mystery is not in how our body(e.g. dairy consumption, hormone replace therapy)
succumbs to cancer; rather the mystery is in how,and estrogen-mimicking molecules (e.g. the leaching of
after years and even decades of chemical exposurebisphenol-A from plastics, and paraben preservatives
and nutrient deprivation our bodies prevail againstin body care products) is crucial in reducing breast
cancer for so long.cancer risk. Supporting estrogen metabolism with the
The primary causes of breast cancer: nutritionalindole-3 carbinol in cruciferous vegetables, blocking
deficiencies, exposure to environmental toxicity,the conversion of androgens into estrogen with
inflammation, estrogen dominance and the resultantaromatase inhibiting foods like white button
breakdown in genetic integrity and immunemushrooms and pomegranate, or aromatase inhibiting
surveillance, are entirely overlooked by this fixationherbs like hops, red clover, and grapeseed, and
on drug therapy and its would-be "magic bullets."reducing estradiol binding to breast cell receptors with
Billions of dollars are raised and funneled towards drugflaxseed lignan and the soy isoflavone genistein, are
research, when the lowly turmeric plant, the humbleall ways in which natural substances have been
cabbage and the unassuming bowl of miso soup maydemonstrated to prevent and inhibit breast cancer.
offer far more promise at preventing and treating3) Inflammation: the Cox-2 enzyme is
breast cancer than all the toximolecular drugs on theover-expressed in most breast cancers, and plays a
market put together.key role in metastasis. This enzyme's job is to literally
When it comes to the breast cancer industry'sburn (oxidize) arachadonic acid, which is its main
emphasis on equating "prevention" with "earlysource of fuel. This process of combustion results in
detection" through x-ray mammography, nowhere isthe production of the pro-inflammatory eicosanoid
the inherently pathological ideology of allopathicknown as prostaglandin E2, which is found in high
medicine more clearly evident. Not only is the verylevels in malignant breast tumors. This entire
ionizing radiation used to discern pathological lesions ininflammatory cascade depends on the production of
breast tissue one of the very risk factors for thearachadonic acid from the consumption of high levels
development of breast cancer, but the identificationof polyunsaturated omega 6 fatty acids found in all
of the word "prevention" with "early detection," is aof those "healthy" grains, seeds and beans (e.g. soy,
disingenuous way of saying that all we can do topeanut) we've been told to consume by public and
prevent breast cancer is to detect its inevitableprivate health organizations. It is excess omega 6
presence sooner than would be possible without thisfatty acid consumption, unopposed by sufficient
technology.levels of the omega 3 fatty acids, that literally
If women succumb to the idea of prevention asprovides the fuel that cancer ultimately feeds off of.
doing nothing but waiting for the detection of the4) The Problem with Calcium: Women are told to
disease, many will find a similarly deranged logicconsume massive amounts of fossilized calcium/chalk
reemerge later when the self-fulfilling prophecy ofin order to prevent osteoporosis, despite the fact
prevention-through-doing-nothing is fulfilled andthat there is absolutely no evidence demonstrating
"treatment" is now required. "Treatment," when notthat thinning and porous bones are caused by a
strictly surgical, involves the use of very powerfullimestone deficiency. Where does all this calcium go?
chemicals and high doses of ionizing radiation whichThe body in the attempt to protect itself from
"poison" the cancer cells. The obvious problem withbiologically inappropriate forms of calcium shunts
these approaches is that the application of eitherexcess into the bone, where through stimulating the
form of death energy is not suitably selective, and inbone-building cells (osteoblasts) to replicate
the long run, many women die sooner from the sideprematurely, the replicative potential (i.e. the fixed
effects of toximolecular "therapy" than from thenumber of replication cycles available to the
cancer itself.osteoblasts throughout one's lifetime) is prematurely
Why is the obvious question never asked: ifexhausted. Although this may contribute to the
exposure to the genotoxic and immune systemproduction of denser bone earlier in life, the bone
disabling effects of chemicals and radiation ismay not be stronger (glass is dense, but structurally
causative in breast cancer, then why is blasting theweak), and the pace of bone formation later in life
body with more poisonous chemicals and radiationwill be outstripped by bone resorption, resulting in
considered sound treatment? The answer to thishigher facture rates, which is exactly the case in high
question has much more to do with ignorance than itcalcium consuming cultures.
does an intentional desire to do harm. But the resultsShunting calcium into the bone as a protective
are the same: unnecessary pain, suffering and death.mechanism is inefficient and results in the elimination
Faced with a situation where medieval notions ofof calcium via other channels, e.g. excreting it through
prevention and treatment of breast cancer are thethe kidneys, perhaps contributing to the narrowing
norm, it is no wonder that when polled over 40% ofand calcification of the artery leading to the kidney
women believe they will contract breast cancer(nephropathy), and calcification within the kidney itself
sometime in their life - well over three times their(kidney stones). The inability to fully rid the body of
actual risk. After all, have any of them been given aexcess calcium via the bones or excretion via the
sense that there is something they can do to actuallykidneys and bowel may lead to the deposition of
prevent their disease other than "watchful waiting"?calcium crystals in the joints (osteoarthritis) and the
Obfuscating the real preventative measures availablearteries (calcification of the fibrous cap on the
to women to combat breast cancer, and all cancersatheroma), and arguably into the soft tissue of
for that matter, trusted "authoritative" sources likebreasts.
the Susan G. Komen Foundation publish irresponsibleThe most common type of breast cancer in
statements like this:American women - mammary ductal carcinoma - is
"It is unclear what the exact relationship is betweenusually discovered in x-ray mammograms by the
eating fruits and vegetables and breast cancerpresence of very small specks of calcium known as
risk...little, if any link was found between the two in amicrocalcifications. It is likely that in susceptible
pooled analysis that combined data from eight largeindividuals limestone (calcium carbonate, and the
studies."various chelate forms: citrate, gluconate, etc) and
Have we really come to the point where thebonemeal supplements (also known as calcium
commonsense consumption of fruits and vegetablesphosphorous or calcium hydroxapatite) will not only
in the prevention of disease can so matter-of-factlylead to the calcification of breast tissue, but may
be called into question? Do we really need placeboexert proliferative effects on that tissue. This theory
controlled, clinical trials to prove beyond a shadow ofhas gained support by a Queensland researcher, Won
a doubt that our bodies can benefit from theJae Lee, who has identified a mechanism by which
phytonutrients and antioxidants in fruits andexcess calcium acts as a mitogen (i.e. stimulating cell
vegetables in the prevention of cancer?division) capable of signaling breast cells to proliferate
Examples like these make it increasingly apparentuncontrollably. By inhibiting the calcium signaling Lee
that orthodox medicine, and the world view itwas able to dramatically block the growth of these
represents, are approaching a theoretical end-timecancers. Although these findings do not prove calcium
perhaps most accurately described as Pharmageddon.supplements cause breast cancer, it raises the
Within the horizon of this perspective vitamins arepossibility that changing the amount and type of
considered toxic, fruits and vegetables simply acalcium in the diet may have profound effects on
source of caloric content (a poor one, at that), andreducing breast cancer risk.
drugs are understood as the only legitimate and forNumerous other natural substances have
that matter, legal, way to combat disease. Are wedemonstrated profound activity against breast
really at the tipping point, or is there still hope?cancer, including but not limited to: vitamin D,
Thanks to thousands of scientific studies extantmelatonin, DHEA, black cohosh, red clover, skullcap,
today on the therapeutic effects of foods, herbs andcranberry, cats claw, grapeseed, inositol
spices on breast health, we still have a fightinghexaphosphate, walnuts and many more.
chance to let sanity and good sense inform our