Low Fat Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention

1>offer more significant benefits and show a closer
relationship between dietary fat and breast cancer
In 2006, results from the world's largest low fat dietrisk.
project were published and led to much speculation5)  Baseline body mass index.  In this study, 74%
as to the relationship between a low fat diet andof the women were classified as overweight by
breast cancer.  Co-author is Dr. James Watson.body mass index at the beginning of the study.  So
In 2006, results from the world’s largest lowwe don't really know if a low-fat diet would offer
fat diet project were published (see reference atbenefits to women who are at a normal weight to
end).  This was a US government-funded study ofbegin with.
48,835 postmenopausal women in a multicenter6)  All the women were postmenopausal.  It may
prospective, randomized clinical trial known as thebe that dietary fat plays a more important role in the
Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlleddiets of younger, premenopausal women.  It makes
Dietary Modification Trial.  The study was conductedsense that your diet in the first 50 years of your life
from 1993 to 2005 at 40 centers around the country.might affect your cancer risk in the second half of
 The volunteers were randomly assigned to either ayour life.  This study doesn't address that question.
low-fat diet group (19,541 women) or a regular diet7)  The type of fat wasn't specified.  There are
group (29,294 women).  After about eight years ofthree basic types of fats: saturated,
follow-up, this large and costly study did not find anymono-unsaturated, and poly-unsaturated.  In this
significant differences in breast cancer incidencestudy, women were asked only to reduce fat. They
between postmenopausal women who were askedweren't asked to consider the various types of fat
to eat a low-fat diet and those who continued to eator told that reducing saturated fats may offer more
their regular diet.  On the other hand, the results didhealth benefits than reducing unsaturated fats. 
suggest that changing to a low-fat diet may reduceSaturated fats are only found in foods that come
the risk of breast cancer for women who had dietsfrom animals and are the types of fats that raise
very high in fat to begin with.  your blood cholesterol level. Trans fats (also called
According to most experts, the following may betrans-saturated fats) are man-made fats.
reasons why this study showed no significant benefit: (Vegetable oils are modified to form margarine and
1)  Not many women met the 20% fat intake goal. vegetable shortening, both of which are trans fats.)
This "low-fat diet" regimen may not have truly been Trans fats also are added to prepackaged foods.
low in fat.  Since most women did not meet the Saturated fats raise your blood's "bad" cholesterol
fat-reduction goal, this study may have proven only(low-density lipoprotein or LDL) level and lower your
that the approach to the intervention did not work."good" cholesterol (high-density lipoprotein or HDL)
 It did not prove that a truly low-fat diet doesn'tlevel.  Mono-unsaturated and poly-unsaturated fats
help protect you from breast cancer.  Getting onlyare found in plant foods like vegetables, nuts, and
20% of your calories from fat is very difficult tograins, as well as oils made from these nuts and
do.  This means that, if you eat 2,000 calories pergrains (canola, corn, soybean). Omega-3 and omega-6
day, only 400 calories could come from fat.  So it'sfatty acids are poly-unsaturated.  Besides
not surprising that less than a third of the womenvegetables, nuts, and grains, omega-3 and omega-6
met this goal after the first year, and only 14%fatty acids are also found in coldwater fish such as
continued to meet the goal after six years.  Becausetuna, salmon, and mackerel.  Some studies have
so few women met the requirements of the study,shown that eating foods that have mono- or
it means that we don't really know how a diet low inpoly-unsaturated fats can help reduce your levels of
fat affects breast cancer risk."bad cholesterol."  Mono- and polyunsaturated fats
2)  Diets were self-reported and infrequent, whichmay also keep your triglyceride levels low.
may make them unreliable.  This study relied on the Triglycerides are a form of fat in your bloodstream.
women's written reports of what they ate, which8)  None of the women in either group were asked
may not be an accurate reflection of true intake.to change their health-related behaviors, such as
 These reports were done occasionally.  No dailyexercise, drinking or smoking.  These known risk
food log or journal was done and checked.  Most offactors for breast cancer were left uncontrolled and
us aren't proud to admit in an interview ormay obscure any benefit from eating less fat. 
questionnaire that we've broken the rules and haven't9)  This study is about a low fat diet; it is not about
stuck to the "prescribed diet."  So there may be agoing from an overweight/obese state to a normal
tendency to under-report the amount of fat actuallyweight.  Eating less fat while staying persistently fat
eaten.may not help anyone!  Since this study cost nearly
3)  Other changes besides the low-fat diet.  Thehalf a billion dollars, it is unlikely that another lifestyle
study did not separate out the effects of reducingintervention clinical trial at this large scale would be
the amount of fat eaten vs. the effects of increasingdone again anytime soon, particularly in the current
fruit and vegetable servings. Women in the low-fatUS economy.
diet group ate almost two more servings per day ofReference: Prentice RL, et al. Low-fat dietary pattern
fruits and vegetables than women in the regular dietand risk of invasive breast cancer: the Women's
group and about one more serving of grains.Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary
4)  Length of follow-up time.  While 48,835 womenModification Trial. Journal of the American Medical
is a lot of people, eight years isn't a lot of follow-upAssociation, volume 295, pages 629-42, 2006.
time.  Eating a low-fat diet for 15 or 20 years may