Is Cancer Research Being True to the Legacy of Terry Fox?

Every year in September millions of Canadians paypretty much like the ones that were being used back
special tribute to a very special young man namedin 1980 -- surgery, chemo-therapy, and radiation.
Terry Fox. Terry was the young Canadian who afterOf course we are told that cancer cure rates have
having his leg amputated because of cancer decidedsubstantially improved. But these statistics are easily
he would run across Canada to raise money formanipulated, and advocates of continuing the current
cancer research. That run took place in the springresearch regime have such a vested interest in
and summer of 1980 and was known as thepointing to their success that their claims have to be
"Marathon of Hope".met with at least mild scepticism.
After 142 days of running 26 miles a day (aOne source that confirms this scepticism is this quote
marathon a day), and after 3339 miles, Terry wasfrom a 1998 article called "Cancer Research -- a
forced to end his run near the city of Thunder Bay,Super Fraud?". Commenting on the US National
Ontario on September 1, 1980. His cancer hadCancer Program Dr.John Bailer said,
returned, and this time it was in his lungs."My overall assessment is that the national cancer
Several months later while still just 22 years old Terryprogramme must be judged a qualified failure" Dr.
succumbed to cancer.John Bailer, who spent 20 years on the staff of the
Running for "Cancer Research"U.S. National Cancer Institute and was editor of its
The initial objective of the Marathon of Hope was tojournal. Dr. Bailer also says: "The five year survival
raise roughly 25 millions dollars -- one dollar for everystatistics of the American Cancer Society are very
Canadian at that time. Terry's goal was actually metmisleading. They now count things that are not
before he died, due to donations and pledges madecancer, and, because we are able to diagnose at an
during his run and during a telethon held shortly afterearlier stage of the disease, patients falsely appear
he was forced to end his run.to live longer. Our whole cancer research in the past
In that short spring and summer of 1980 Terry had20 years has been a total failure. More people over
become one of Canada's most important and30 are dying from cancer than ever before... More
inspirational heroes, and the legacy of the "Marathonwomen with mild orbenign diseases are being included
of Hope" has lived on for 25 years, increasing in itsin statistics and reported as being 'cured'. When
appeal and scope every year.government officials point to survival figures and say
The annual "Terry Fox Run" continues to be heldthey are winning the war against cancer they are
annually across Canada, the US, and other countriesusing those survival rates improperly."
around the world. According to current sources, theDisrepectful?
Terry Fox Run has now raised more than $400 millionTo many people comments like this sound like an
for cancer research.insult to the millions who have put their hope in a high
Are we further ahead after $400 million?tech cure for cancer. And many are afraid to
For Canadians Terry Fox is the ultimate hero, and thisquestion the status quo because of the respect we
makes it sacreligious to even suggest that all is nothave for people like Terry Fox.
well with the Marathon of Hope and the "cancerBut I wonder if a 22 year old with the innocence and
research" that it fuels.courage to take on the impossible task of running
Nevertheless I suspect Terry himself would be5,000 miles on one legwould be happy with the way
surprised that we are not further along the road to athings are today.
"cure for cancer" after raising and devoting such anWould Terry Fox be happy to see that some cancer
amazingly large amount of money to that cause.society branches in the US devote only about 10%
The amounts of money raised in the US and otherof the funds they raise to the actual delivery of
countries are even more staggering, and in spite ofcancer services? Would he understand why
very few tangible results to show for the "research"substantial portions of cancer society budgets go for
that is carried on, people continue to shell out moneythe purchase of real estate and buildings rather
because they have been told, and continue to believethanactually helping cancer victims and doing research
that a cure is "right around the corner."into the causes of cancer?
Is it possible that the cancer research industry mayWould he be pleased to learn that the boards of the
have become a cushy gravy train for the thousandsmajor cancer organizations are filled with executives
of fund raisers and researchers who make their livingwith ties to drug and chemical companies?
this way?Would he take comfort in the fact that the
Some critics have even suggested that the "cancerwell-known environmental causes of cancer are
industry" has become little more than an arm of thevirtually ignored by researchers because these so
pharmaceutical and chemical industries? (For anoften implicate food, chemical and drug companies?
interesting article that offers a critical analysis of theWould he be glad that the efforts of researchers and
America Cancer Society, go to American Cancerfund raisers might actually be standing in the way of
Society: The World's Wealthiest "Nonprofit"real progress in the fight against cancer because
Institution.these researchers are so often in the employ of the
Legitimate questions we should be askingvery corporations that profit from the sale of cancer
At the very minimum it seems a perfectly legitimatecausing products?
question to ask "How much 'cure' has all this moneyBack in 1980 when Terry was running through
bought us?"Ontario he was asked by a passerby if he thought
I don't know. But I suspect it is not a lot. I may behe was being used. "I want them to use me more."
hopelessly behind the times, but it seems to me thatwas Terry's reply.
most of the "cures" being practised these days are