Hormone Replacement Therapy after Breast Cancer

Generally speaking, a great deal has already beenphysician's surveillance, they are more likely to get
discussed on the issue of hormone replacementannual screenings. Although there is no difference
therapy. However, less is known specifically aboutbetween women who are not on hormone
this form of therapy for breast cancer survivors. Onereplacement and those who are on it for less than
reason for this is that physicians are concerned aboutten years, once the duration exceeds the ten-year
prescribing any of these drugs to their patients forbenchmark, there is a slight increase in breast cancer
fear that it might increase the risk of cancerincidence, but the numbers are insignificant. There
recurrence. But along with this, blanket statementsalso appears to be anecdotal data that women with
regarding hormone replacement therapy are quitebreast lobular neoplasm may have an increased risk
inappropriate. Each individual woman should be givenfor recurrence with hormone replacement therapy.
the chance to consider the risks and benefits ofHowever, with or without this form of therapy,
hormone replacement based on their personalthese women are still at an increased risk of
situation. Every woman experiences menopauserecurrence.
differently, with varying degrees of symptoms. SomeOn the other end of the spectrum, how does one
women go through menopause with little difficultyknow that one is cured of breast cancer?
and without increased risk of osteoporosis or heartUnfortunately, there is no absolute way to know.
disease. For others, menopause is traumatic and canStatistical probabilities can be given based on the
introduce increased chances of illness into their lives.cancer's characteristics. If one is destined to relapse,
Professional practice in medicine has endorsedit will usually happen in the first five years after the
allowing women to replace ovarian hormones withdiagnosis. Regrettably, late recurrences do rarely
hormone replacement therapy once the ovaries beginoccur. Breast cancer patients are advised that once
to fail. Evidence and clinical experiences indicate thattreatment is complete, they should consider
the benefits clearly outweigh the risk and expense ofthemselves cured, move on.
such therapy. However, evidence has yet to beMedical research shows that low dose hormone
found with regards to the risks to women survivingreplacement therapy for less than 10 years does not
beast cancer. Most concerns are based onsignificantly contribute to the development of breast
speculation and anecdotal experience alone.cancer in the general population, but the question is,
For most women, the question lies in the correlationdoes this apply to the population of women cured of
between hormone replacement therapy and anbreast cancer? Sadly, there are no studies to confirm
increased risk of breast cancer. Does hormonethis and no evidence has yet surfaced from past
therapy contribute to breast cancer? Before startingstudies to answer this. The safest way to think
such treatment, physicians often require theirabout it though, is that for women with a high
patients to get a baseline screening mammogram andprobability of cure, the benefits of this treatment far
because women receiving treatment are under aoutweigh the risks.