Breast Cancer Screening is Worthwhile

In the medical journal Lancet recently, Danishfactors which suggest that screening reduces the
researchers criticised clinical trials looking into breastnumber of deaths more than was estimated(4).
cancer screening. Their article has attracted wideInclude all evidence
publicity. They claimed that some of the medicalEminent scientists who are independent of these
research supporting the value of screening for breasttrials agree with this analysis. Sir Richard Peto, one of
cancer was not reliable. The only two clinical trialsthe most respected researchers in this field, said
they thought were acceptable either did not find any'evidence from all trials should be included' (New
reduction in deaths from breast cancer throughScientist, 15th January 2000). And Professor Jack
screening, or found that screening increases the riskCuzick wrote in the British Medical Journal on 15th
of death from other causes.January: 'Screening detects cancers when they are
A major target for this attack was the largest study,smaller and more easily treated; cancer rates are
the Swedish two-county trial. The objection of thereduced following screening; and trials have shown
researchers (PC Gatzsche and O Olsen) to this studythat mortality is reduced by 20-30%.'
was that the group of people invited to screeningBalanced reviews which include all the evidence show
were on average five months older than the otherthat deaths from breast cancer are reduced by
group (in 133,000 women aged 40-74). In fact, thenearly a third (30%) in women invited to screening;
Swedish two-county study investigators showed thatand there is no increase in deaths from other causes
taking age into account, there was a 30% reductionin this group.
in breast cancer deaths and a 1% reduction (noIll-considered publications must not be allowed to
increase) in deaths from all causes in the group ofcause anxiety to women invited to screening, nor to
people invited to be screened(2). There are otherdamage the morale of the staff who provide the
problems with Gatzsche and Olsen's interpretation.screening. People need to know that Gatzsche and
They ignore evidence of errors in one of the trialsOlsen's paper is not worth a moment's attention.
they thought were acceptable(3). And they ignore