Breast Cancer - Radiation-induced Agony and Metastases - Part 2

I have related the sad but not unusual case story ofroutinely recommended for cancer patients despite
Gene in Part 1 of this three-part article. What hadthe fact that there is no proven benefit to survival ...
happened to Gene is what I have been seeingAlthough cancer specialists know that very few
happen all too often. After chemotherapy andcancer patients are cured by radiotherapy, they
radiotherapy the cancer spread to the bone. I havecontinue to recommend it widely because they
often wondered if the treatments had anything toconsider it to be a relatively harmless procedure."
do with the metastasis. Not much information can beIn the booklet, Radiation Therapy and You, published
obtained from the medical literature. It appears thatby the US National Cancer Institute, the following
such question is not important? Or is it a matter ofassurances are given: "Although some normal cells are
"natural course of event"? I tend to think otherwise.affected by the radiation, most of them appear to
Read about radiotherapy in any standard textbookrecover more fully from the effects of radiation than
and it is acknowledged that radiation itself can causethe cancer cells. Doctors carefully limit the intensity of
cancer. In Gene's case, it is even acknowledged thatthe treatment and the area being treated so that
the increased uptake of tracer seen in L3, L4 and L5the cancer will be affected more than the normal
vertebrae is most likely due to DXT. Medical peoplehealthy tissues. Radiation therapy is an effective way
use medical terms that may be hard for a laypersonto treat many kinds of cancer in any part of the
to understand. So the information written in a medicalbody."
report often goes unnoticed or not understood. DXTThis is the official version of the "goodness" of
is medical abbreviation for deep X-ray treatment orradiotherapy. Do you believe it? Hear what other
radiotherapy and this statement above explicitlydoctors have to say about radiotherapy.
implicates the disastrous role of radiotherapy inJohn Cairns, a professor at the Harvard University
treating Gene's breast cancer. It has done muchSchool of Public Health (in Scientific American,
harm.November 1985) said: "The majority of cancers
Are we to believe that Gene is just one rarecannot be cured by radiation because the dose of
unfortunate victim. I don't believe that this is so.X-rays required to kill the cancer cells would also kill
Dr. Richard Evans (in The Cancer Breakthroughthe patient." John Lee et. al. (in What Your Doctor
You've Never Heard Of) wrote: "It is my opinion thatMay Not Tell You About Breast Cancer) wrote:
adjuvant radiation is used more often than necessary"Radiation reduces (breast cancer) death by 13.2
... The long-term risks of radiation therapy have notpercent, it increases death from other causes, mostly
been completely determined." John Robbins has toheart disease by 21.2 percent. The obvious conclusion
say in his book (Reclaiming Our Health) "Radiation isis: the treatment was a success but the patient died!